Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brad Hansen's avatar

I have ambivalent feelings about Lent. I grew up Episcopalian, in which Lent was a BIG DEAL. I interpreted it as a time of sadness, where our responsibility was to feel sorry for all the wrongs I have done. Given the fact that I was extremely introverted, overly self-conscious about how people saw me, and given to the depressive side, Easter Sunday couldn't come too soon.

In my years as a pastor, I gradually pulled away from any emphasis on Lent. There were people in almost all my churches who spoke of what they were giving up for Lent. I never chided anyone for their decisions and personal practices. But I've always felt that I should not impose on a church body any tradition or practice which Scripture does not demand. No one should believe that they must mount some heroic feat of spiritual achievement to be pleasing to God. Jesus is not recruiting some Mission Impossible team to do what the rest of the church can't.

The Christian life is steady journey toward the end for which we were redeemed. We are given ordinary means of grace as a church to pursue this end - Scripture, the Sacraments, and Prayer. It's not rocket science. It's not a climb to Mount Everest. The message of the gospel is that the climb was made which we could not make.

So yes, weakness is a huge factor for the Christian to grasp; but it's not a season. It's built into the journey of following Jesus. According to Paul, it was the fine print of the apostolic "contract" (2 Corinthians is so good a this point).

Okay, so this is WAAAAY too long and probably sounds like the scoldings of a Russian Babushka. Apologies!

Blessings and well-wishes.

Expand full comment
Caryl Wiebe's avatar

Yay!!

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts